The Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of Bolivia is today analysing the possibility of moving forward to next Sunday the second presidential debate convened by this state body, according to an official source.

«My department has requested, based on several petitions, that this debate take place on Sunday 10 August, as it’s a day when families gather. This is a preliminary request; (…) I would ask for reconsideration towards a highly anticipated presidential debate,» stated TSE member Tahuichi Tahuichi Quispe.

The initial date for the second debate was set for Tuesday 12 August at the Hotel Europa in La Paz.

According to the authority, the format will mirror the first debate held in Santa Cruz, running from 20:30 to 23:00 local time.

Tahuichi indicated the sole difference would be the topics addressed, which this time will include economy, health, education, and citizen security.

This request follows similar proposals from several parties and political alliances, which also advocated rescheduling the event since next Tuesday coincides with electoral campaign closing activities.

Meanwhile, TSE member Yahaira San Martín emphasised this weekend that «this is a matter the Full Chamber will determine. The request to move the date will be evaluated. We’re considering Saturday or Sunday, or ultimately keeping Tuesday.»

The first presidential debate occurred last Friday night in Santa Cruz de la Sierra with participation from all eight authorised candidates.

Organisers included the TSE, the Confederation of Private Entrepreneurs of Bolivia (CEPB), and the National Association of Bolivian Journalists (ANPB).

The forum focused on three thematic axes: democracy, justice and rule of law; human rights and social protection; environment and development.

Opening the event, TSE Acting President Óscar Hassenteufel highlighted the debate’s importance as a pluralistic and democratic space.

«The informed vote is the most powerful tool we Bolivians have to influence the country’s direction, ensure our voices are heard and our interests represented,» asserted Hassenteufel.